Photo of a Short-billed Dowitcher. At least now, after 15 years, I’m finally making a call that this is one, given the advice of several folks. Click for a larger view.
Ok, after much debate and consulting with other folks, I think I have a better handle now on identification of Short-billed Dowitchers vs. Long-billed Dowitchers. It’s still not an easy call, but after 15 years of birding, I’d never mentally/physically “checked off” Short-billed Dowitcher on my life list. Long-billed Dowitchers are the ones that are more often found in fresh water areas, and are more often found on the interior of the continent, and until this point, I’d just mentally called any Dowitcher I saw in South Dakota as a Long-billed.
I’m now adding Short-billed Dowitcher to my list, based on the top photo here and the advice of several folks. I had a photo of about 10 different Dowitchers, but this is the one (a crop of the photo showing 10 birds) that most people pointed to as being most clearly a Short-billed Dowitcher What’s interesting is that opinions varied as to why, but the ID points hit the ID points provided in the exhaustive SurfBirds page on Dowitcher identification. For this bird, ID keys are the following:
- V-shaped lower coverts with white running up the sides of the feather more than a Long-billed Dowitcher. Long-billed Dowitcher lower coverts are described as more “squared off”, with white that doesn’t run up the side of the feather a bit.
- Droop in last 1/3rd of the bill. You definitely see that on this bird. I’m not totally sold on this ID mark though, as I’ve seen conflicting information online about whether this is diagnostic.
- Primary projection. Short-billed Dowitchers are supposed to have slightly longer wings, and have primaries that extend out from the tertials more. This guy has long primaries.
- Slimmer shape than a Long-billed Dowitcher. I forget whether I read it or whether it was an ID key someone sent me, but supposedly Long-billed Dowitchers are chunkier looking, with the description being that they look like they “swallowed a grapefruit”. In terms of shape/structure, this also results in a straighter back for the supposedly slimmer Short-billed Dowitcher, while in profile a Long-billed Dowitcher has a kink/dip/indentation in the back towards the tail.
- “Arched” supercilium. This is a mark from the SurfBirds article online, and there are also other sites that note Long-billed Dowitchers seem to have a straighter, less steep slope on the forehead than Short-billed Dowitchers. The result is supposedly a straighter supercilium on a Long-billed, with a Short-billed Dowitcher having the “arch” in the supercilium shape.
- Light looking underparts with modest barring/spots. Hard to see in this angle, but the bird does seem to be relatively light-colored underneath, with lighter/white areas. Long-billed Dowitchers are supposed to be more uniform and colorful below.
Three dowitcher tails captured while in flight. Black-and-white barring thickness is supposed to be diagnostic for Dowitchers, with Short-billed Dowitchers having wider white bars than Long-billed Dowitchers
One other potential difference between the two species is the width of the black-and-white barring in the tail (visible in flight). As this group of birds flew by at one point, I did get a (rather bad) photo that captured parts of 6 birds. For Long-billed Dowitchers, the black bars in the tail are supposed to be significantly thicker than the white bars. For Short-billed Dowitchers, the white bars are wider, and can be as wide as the black bars. This 2nd photo shows the 3 tails captured in that bad flight photo. To me, the white bars in that bottom photo are definitely wider than the white bars in the top 2 photos. I of course have no idea which bird may be the wading bird depicted in the top photo, but it could be possible 2 of these 3 birds are Long-billed Dowitchers, and the bottom one is Short-billed.
I also find it interesting how the relationship between leg length and tail differs between the top 2, and the bottom image. In the bottom image, the legs appear to stick out further from the tail than in the top 2 photos. It could just be the poor quality of the photo, or the fact that in the bottom bird, the tail isn’t fanned out as much. But Long-billed Dowitchers ARE supposed to a have a longer tail than Short-billed Dowitchers. Could that be while the tail seems to cover more of the legs and feet int he top two birds, compared to the bottom one?
Whew. If you take just one of any of the ID keys above, there’s no way I’d make a call, particularly on my own. But given the “match” of several different ID keys, and given the opinions of others, I’m (finally) comfortable calling the bird in the top photo a Short-billed Dowitcher.