Tag Archives: ObamaCare

Obama’s Big Week

Supreme Court Building

WAY TO GO, JOHN ROBERTS! I take back everything I've ever said about the lack of objectivity in your court. GUTSY move, for you, the Chief Justice, a Bush appointee, to side with the "liberal" justices on the health care bill.

Way to go, SCOTUS!!!

Way to go, John Roberts!!  With the immigration ruling, and with the decision today to uphold ALL parts of the health care law…you may have just turned around the reputation of this Supreme Court as a right-wing, activist court.  It will be very hard now for wacko liberal bloggers like myself to doubt Robert’s objectivity now.   A shocking turn of events.  Obama has been floundering, there’s no doubt.  I never would have thought it would be the Supreme Court that would have given him a big boost.

It will be interesting to see how this affects the election.  Romney this week came out and said Obama’s first term was “wasted” if the health care law were struck down. I’m sure the Romney camp EXPECTED it to be overturned, but now I bet they regret coming out with that statement.  Since the entire law was upheld, Romney’s statement now looks like an endorsement that Obama’s first term HASN’T been a waste, that real, meaningful legislation has been passed.

Wow.

In shock.  And (way) more than a bit emotional, when I think of my son, and what this ruling potentially means to someone like him, a young kid with juvenile diabetes.

Let the whining begin from the right!!  The news is hot off the presses, and we ALREADY having whining, and the typical conservative LIES about the bill.  As a reminder to all you wackos who insist on lying about Obamacare and its effects (From CNN and other sources):

  • The law is intended to end the United States’ status as the only rich country with large numbers of uninsured people, by expanding both the private market and Medicaid
  • Health insurance for between 12.5 million and 24 million more Americans than if the mandate was struck down
  • The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that the law could reduce deficits modestly in the first 10 years and then much more significantly in the second decade
  • Insured Americans may be avoiding a spike in premiums that could have resulted if the high court had tossed out the individual mandate but left other requirements on insurers in place.
  • Millions of young adults up to age 26 who have gained health insurance due to the law will be able to keep it.
  • Since the law remains in place, the requirement that insurers cover people with pre-existing medical conditions remains active
  • The massive health care law requires doctors to report goodies they get from medical supply companies; demands more breastfeeding rooms; requires all chain restaurants to list calories under every menu item, and includes numerous other provisions, which now remain in place.

Horrible!  Reduced deficits!  MILLIONS more Americans covered by insurance!  No turning down the sick for insurance because of their preexisting conditions!!

Tell me again, conservative wackos…why is Obamacare the end of the world in your eyes???!!?

Supreme Court Immigration Ruling? ObamaCare? Trivial to this…

Supreme Court Building

Arizona's immigration bill and Obamacare are the 2 hot topics from the Supreme Court this week, but those rulings are nothing compared to today's ruling on campaign finance.

It’s a huge week in terms of Supreme Court rulings. Legal pundits are in a tizzy as to the court’s ruling today about Arizona’s immigration law, and what’s to come Thursday when they announce their decision on the legality of ObamaCare.  Big cases?  You bet.  But in the big scheme of things…they mean little compared to another, MUCH less publicized decision the was announced today.

Today the Supreme Court refused to hear reconsideration of the ruling that States couldn’t limit campaign contributions by corporations. With this ruling, the Supreme Court is reaffirming its OK for unlimited spending by corporate sponsors for political campaigns in this country.

The decision?  5-4, of course!!  This is America, where “law” (hah!!) is dictated more on political terms than on legal terms. As I’ve stated out here before, I’ve NEVER understood why there are “liberal” judges and “conservative” judges in the eye of the legal pundits. Isn’t law above political ideology?  Evidently not, when case after case from this Supreme Court is decided on a 5-4 split, with the 5 “conservative” justices holding more sway over political issues in this country right now than any senator, house member, or president.

The gap between rich and poor in the U.S. has continually widened in recent decades, to the absolute CHASM that exists today.  With this ruling?  It only gets worse. Unlimited campaign contributions from big business means a continuation of policies skewed towards the uber-rich, as politicians from BOTH parties bow to the power of the almighty dollar, and the corporate backers behind it.  The little guy?  The middle class?  How can they POSSIBLY compete with unlimited campaign dollars from big business? 

Never has the political power of the common man been less in the U.S.  THIS is the Supreme Court decision this week that REALLY matters in the long-term.  The rest of what’s happening this week is trivial in comparison.

Americans Love Obamacare Provisions

Sometimes it’s downright scary to know we allow everyone over the age of 18 to vote.  I’m not saying it shouldn’t be that way, but, it’s scary to have a democracy built on majority rule, when far too often, the majority are completely ignorant.

In this story, MSNBC notes that 56% of Americans are against Obamacare, with 44% approval.  However…they note that Americans are strongly in favor of the actual CONTENTS of the health care legislation behind Obamacare. 

It’s like someone really LOVING a bag of cookies, but throwing it away because they don’t like the wrapper.  Content good!! Obamacare PR? Bad…in no small part due to Republican distortions (aka, lies) about the bill, and the idiot electorate who is dumb enough to believe the lies.

Romney Tells Governors to Lie About Recovery

Romney and Obama

More deception, more lying from Romney. Is this what happens to a GOP candidate? Is the GOP SO corrupt, that any GOP presidential candidate turns to a lying POS? Before the last election...I LIKED John McCain. I RESPECTED John McCain. They he runs for president, and everything he ever stood for went out the window. Romney is headed down the same path. I USED to think he wasn't bad, a Republican governor with a moderate, pragmatic streak. Now? He's a lying, deceptive, slick POS...

The economy has been recovering in several swing states.  Uh-oh, says Romney, we can’t have that!  At least, we can’t let the electorate know the truth!  Hence, the story of Romney telling GOP governors to downplay any economic recovery that’s happened in their states.  He’s told GOP governors to cool it, and not talk about improved economic conditions, lowered unemployment rates, etc.

After all, we can’t have voters knowing the truth!  It fits right in line with the overall GOP strategy of SCARING voters into voting for them, by either playing to their inner bigotry, or playing up just how “bad” things are, or will be, under Obama. Even if they’re not!

Romney continues to bash Obama on foreign policy and national defense fronts, stating that under Obama, we’re much less safe.  This, despite the incredible foreign policy and military successes under Obama.  When Obama DARED to try to obtain contraceptive coverage for those individuals who wanted it but couldn’t get it through their insurance…Romney fell all over himself stating that religious freedoms are “under attack” by Obama, and would shrivel if he were given another term.  There’s a lovely new attack ad on Obama by the National Republican Campaign Committee that claims under ObamaCare, there are massive new taxes on ‘heart attacks, sick puppies, and new babies’.

Romney and other Republican attacks on ObamaCare alone probably keeps the entire staff of FactCheck.org working 24 hours a day.  What’s one more lie, on top of all the others?  Romney knows that lying works, since far too often, the electorate believes this kind of crap.

My son and REAL life – ObamaCare

Alexander
Our son, the week after coming home from the hospital after being diagnosed with Type-1 diabetes.

Obamacare isn’t popular.  But there ARE key provisions of Obamacare that are very popular.  One of these is a guarantee of insurance coverage for those with pre-existing conditions, a provision supported by 85% of Americans.  Other provisions are also very popular, such as the ability to cover your children until they turn 26.  Despite the popularity of these provisions, about half of America would like ObamaCare to be repealed.  Perhaps that half should look past the political BS and look at the real-world effects of ObamaCare.

My 9-year old son has had Type-1 diabetes since just after his 1st birthday.  We are fortunate enough to have good insurance, but I shudder to think of those in our situation without insurance.  Our son has an insulin pump, which alone costs $8,000.  Supplies for the pump?  $1,800 every 3 months.  And that doesn’t include other supplies for testing blood, doctor visits, etc.  What happens for someone like us under Obamacare, vs. under the status quo?  What are the REAL world effects should Obamacare be repealed?

First, Obamacare extends the length of time parents can cover their children.  We could cover our son until his 26th birthday.  Secondly, once he turns 26 and needs to get his own coverage, he couldn’t be discriminated against because of a pre-existing condition.  But what if Obamacare is repealed?  What happens to someone like my son?  What happens when he turns 26, and has to get coverage on his own?  Could he even GET coverage, given that he has Type-1 diabetes?  What happens if he has to change jobs?  In a post-ObamaCare world, who pays the thousands of dollars for supplies that my son’s VERY LIFE depends upon???

My wife and I both have good jobs, but even so, I can’t imagine trying to pay for pump and other supplies, without insurance coverage.  That nightmare is a REALITY for thousands of Americans, until ObamaCare fully takes effect.  We OURSELVES have heard from families with poor or no insurance coverage, who have had a child diagnosed with Type-1 diabetes.  We OURSELVES have gotten stories from parents whose options are few.  For a parent with a child with Type-1 diabetes, you’re constantly fighting against time and the inexorable march of the disease.  As time marches on, the liklihood of complications rises, be it coronary disease, kidney damage, diabetic retinopathy resulting in blindness, etc.  Your ONLY weapon against it right now?  Controlling your child’s blood sugar as best as you can.  To do that, an insulin pump is indispensible.

But this is America.  We seem to value corporate profits more than the health of our own children.  For FAR too many with poor or no insurance coverage, the only choice is to skimp on diabetic supplies, using constant insulin injections and paying for testing supplies as you can.  Do you have ANY idea how DAMN HARD it is to constantly have to give your young child multiple shots, every day, day-after-day, with NO end?  Do you have ANY idea how DAMN HARD it is when the first phrase your child learns to put together is “No Shot!! No Shot!!!” (something we dealt with). It tears your heart out.  God knows I broke down like a baby the first time I had to give my son a shot, while he was in the hospital after being diagnosed.  And that definitely wasn’t the only time.

For the first year and a half after diagnosis, my 1-year old son had to endure a minimum of 3 injections per day, usually more.  Every meal had to be planned in advance, every carb counted.  For 8 years since, we’ve also maintained a constant regimen of blood tests, including my wife and I taking turns being the one who gets up in the middle of the night to check him.  Despite our best efforts, it was very difficult to control his blood sugars during that first year and a half.  Despite our best efforts, I felt like we were “failing” our son, because we knew that in the long-term, an inability to control blood sugars made diabetic complications much more likely.

When our son was 2, we were blessed with the opportunity to start using an insulin pump.  Instead of 3+ injections a day, he only needed one “site change” every 3 days.  Instead of carefully planning every meal and snack well ahead of time to ensure he was getting the right amount of carbs to match the insulin we estimated was left in his body…he now could now eat whatever he wants, whenever he wants.  We just have to type in the number of carbs, and the pump gives him the correct amount of insulin.  Best of all, his blood sugar control was DRAMATICALLY better.  We’ve at least done all we can to slow the progression of the disease.

But let’s say you’re a single mom without health insurance, and you’re facing the same nightmare we have.  Can that single mom afford a pump for her child?  Or is she forced to choose a life of painful injections, KNOWING there’s a better way, but also knowing that in America, the health of her child isn’t as important as the profits of a health insurer?  What about a middle class family in this situation who is forced into a job or location change?  Will that family be able to get insurance coverage for their child with a pre-existing condition?  Or will they too be forced to choose between incredibly expensive payments for insulin pump equipment, or using cheaper methods of blood sugar control?

Why should they HAVE to make that choice?  Is this America?  Or is this some third-world country with a government, health-care system, and a PEOPLE unable, or UNWILLING to make the health of their children a national priority?

THIS is the reality of ObamaCare.  It is NOT a political tool to be wielded like a weapon by the two parties. ObamaCare is about REAL PEOPLE.  It’s about covering people who’s very LIVES are in jeopardy without insurance coverage.  It’s about Americans acting as if they GIVE A DAMN about the health of their children.

The 9 Politicians on the Supreme Court

John Roberts

Chief Justice John Roberts...just a man. Just like the rest of us, he and his colleagues let their biases affect their decision-making. INCLUDING how they interpret "law".

l’ve purposely tried to avoid getting too immersed in the Supreme Court hearings this week over ObamaCare.  The reason?  Every time I read an update on what’s happening, I get PO’d.  As I stated 2 days ago before things even got started…I fully expect a 5-4 decision that tosses out, at a minimum, the insurance mandate portion of ObamaCare.   Only because there are 5 “conservative” judges and 4 “liberal” judges.

As I stated then, I don’t think the decision will be based on the “law”, but would be based on the political persuasions of the individual justices.  I haven’t seen anything yet that changes my perception of what will happen.  The questions being asked by some of the “conservative” justices seem like something straight out of the Republican presidential campaign right now.  Roberts basically implied a ”what’s next” scenario if ObamaCare is allowed to stand, as if it’s all part of some evil liberal plot for government to take over, well, EVERYTHING!!  BUUUU-WAAA-HAAA-HAAA-HAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!  DRAT, Fellow Liberals!  They’re on to our evil plan!!

What it’s ALL about evidently…Broccolli!!  Scalia even came out and said that if ObamaCare stands…”What’s Next”…the government forcing us all to eat broccoli?  GREAT legal argument, Scalia!!  Broccoli-gate has played an unexpected role in the entire debate.  Scalia also embarassed himself by bitching about the “Cornhusker Kickback” component of ObamaCare.  Only problem…the “Cornhusker Kickback” doesn’t exist, after it was stricken from the original bill before it passed.  Sounds like another Republican trademark…if you can’t find something to bitch about, make up some kind of conspiracy out of thin air.

It’s not like the Supreme Court is different from the rest of government.  After all…all the States fighting against ObamaCare have Republican governors, while those supporting it have Democratic governors.  What an AMAZING coincidence!! 

Politico has a nice story here about the “Roberts Court on Trial“, where they speculate on whether this case will cement, or clear, the perception that political persuasion rules the court.  It’s fascinating to read the transcripts of the discussions over the last three days.  If you knew NOTHING about the court, NOTHING about the individual personalities on the court…it would be IMMEDIATELY apparent upon reading the transcripts who were the “conservative” or “liberal” justices.  Hey, they’re people.  They have biases and opinions just like the rest of us.  And despite their position on the Nation’s highest court, I see few indications that they’re able to look past those biases and prejudices any more than the rest of us.   American “law” is just as apt to be corrupted by the same ugly, partisan, political discourse that has invaded every OTHER aspect of American life.

5 to 4.  Count on it.

Perusin’ & Musin’

Some random thoughts from perusin’ the web:

Obama Caught with Open Mic - In a story the GOP is sure to play up from now through the election, Obama was caught saying something to Russian president Medvedev about the European missile defense system, asking the Russian to give him “space” on the issue until after the election.  It’s not exactly surprising to hear that when (seemingly) out of the range of an open mic, this is how a politician would talk.  There’s no doubt Republicans will act indignant on the story, and will righteously declare that all Obama cares about is getting re-elected, and is just playing politics until the election.  And…they’re probably right.  Obama can take heart though that 1) Republicans are JUST as apt to put politics over the welfare of the country, and 2) in the short news cycles we have, it’s only a matter of time before Romney makes a verbal gaffe and pushes this off the front pages.  The real losers in all of this are all the voters. I can already picture scads of Republican ads this fall that feature this Obama comment, just as I can already see scads of Democratic ads this fall that feature stupid Romney comments.

When do plants know to bloom in Spring? - This story is definitely relevant this spring!  Interesting read if you get a chance.  We’ve already got things blooming here, in South Dakota, in March, in response to the incredibly warm weather we’re having.  There have even been Hummingbirds spotted in adjacent states of Nebraska and Minnesota!  I don’t usually see them at my house until the first week of May! But as this story notes, for some plants, day length doesn’t matter, temperature alone can trigger blooming. As such…my hummingbird feeder is going up this week!!  Who knows??

Tim Tebow welcomed in New York - Few things bother me more in life than our incredibly shallow American culture, and what passes for being a “celebrity”.  We have “celebrities” who have done nothing more than be participants in a “reality” (hah!) TV show, or are simply famous for being complete jackasses.   In the sports world, the artificial nature of being a “celebrity” was quite obvious over the past week, when the Denver Broncos signed Peyton Manning to be their QB, and subsequently traded Tim Tebow to the New York Jets.  Manning is a Super Bowl winner and an NFL MVP.  Tim Tebow?  He was one of the poorest rated quarterbacks in the NFL last year.  But yet, the stories have at LEAST been 5 to 1 about Tebow instead of about Manning.  Tebow to me is one of those “artificial” celebrities, now that his college career is well in the past.  He CERTAINLY doesn’t deserve the attention for what he’s accomplished on the field in the NFL.  He gets attention simply because of his very public, very over-the-top profession of his religious faith.  In America…THAT’s what gets you noticed…acting outside-the-box.  Peyton Manning’s accomplishments?  Unimportant compared to Tebow’s unusual personal life.  I wish I could say it was just sports, but this story is a microcosm of America in general.  Working hard and achieving great things in your line of work?  That’ll get you nowhere!! What you NEED is a viral video! What you NEED is to be a wacky, vocal jackass!  THAT’S the kind of thing that gets you noticed in today’s America!

Supreme Court Tackles Obamacare - The Supreme Court today started hearing arguments regarding the legality of ObamaCare.   In a poll, 56% of Americans believe Supreme Court Justices will rule according to their own personal politics, while only 27% believe that ObamaCare will be judged according to the law.   I can’t say as I disagree.  What’s always baffled me…why SUPREME COURT JUSTICES are either categorized as “Liberal” or “Conservative”.  Isn’t the LAW above politics?  Why the HELL should LAW be judged according to one’s own personal politics?  Are American laws SO poorly written, are they SO open to personal interpretation, that Supreme Court decisions are (seemingly) always split according to perceived political persuasion of the Justices?   In the end, what I FULLY expect…a 5-4 decision to repeal the mandate component of Obamacare. Why?  Not because of any legal precedent or ruling.  No, I expect a 5-4 ruling to repeal much of Obamacare, simply because 5 current justices are considered “Conservative”.  Hey…I TELL you that I’m a CYNICAL scientist.  Unfortunately, when it comes to my cynicism in matters such as this, I also have a hell of a lot of evidence to back me up.

Obamacare Covering 2.5 Million more youth

Thanks to the new health care bill, the percentage of young Americans with health insurance has risen dramatically. If I'm Obama, I'm DARING the GOP to focus on repeal.

Why in the hell so many people are against the health care reform bill is beyond me.  Every INDEPENDENT (aka, NOT FOX NEWS!!) analysis has shown the bill will reduce costs, or at least be a wash, AND cover millions more Americans.  But yet the right has chosen Obamacare as a rallying cry against big government, and a rallying cry for the 2012 election, lying about the costs and benefits of the bill while they’re at it.

Yesterday, the CDC announced that thanks to the new health care bill, 2.5 million more young Americans have health coverage.  In the 19-25 year range, the percentage of insured rose from 64% to 73%.  The increase is largely due to a provision which allows parents to keep their children on their insurance through age 26. 

Obama has had a terrific foreign policy record since taking office, capturing Bin Laden and ending the Iraq war.  Now, things are starting to roll his way more on domestic issues.  Unemployment is edging down, first time applicants for unemployment are at their lowest level since the recession began, and now, the benefits of the health care bill are starting to take effect.  If nothing else, Obama has a LOT of ammunition for 2012 debates against the GOP candidate.  He’s had some remarkable successes, especially given the cards he was dealt, and the impossible to work with GOP-led House.

Letting uninsured die…unfortunately not hypothetical

Uninsured Rate

50 million uninsured in the U.S., but if the Tea Party has their way, many may be dead soon! That will also help our unemployment rate!

My last blog post was on the crowd reaction (and Ron Paul reaction) to Wolf Blitzer following up on a health care question by asking if the uninsured should just be allowed to die if they are ill.  As the news today shows, that unfortunately isn’t a hypothetical question from Blitzer, as the number of uninsured in the U.S. has grown to nearly 50 million.  Not only is unemployment an issue for the American worker, but so is health care coverage, as the percentage of employers that even offer health insurance to their employees continues to drop, as does the amount employers themselves pay if insurance is offered.

50 million uninsured, in what we ourselves supposedly think is the greatest and most powerful country on the planet?   A 2009 Harvard study found 45,000 people die in the U.S. every year due to lack of health insurance.  The same study found those without health insurance have an overall 40% higher risk of death than the insured.   But still, we have the Tea Party and seemingly every GOP candidate railing against ObamaCare.  God forbid we try to insure people and ensure equal access to health care for every American.   After all, it’s MUCH more important for Tea Party Joe down the street to have an extra $30 in his paycheck so he can afford an extra case of beer a week, than it is for an uninsured mother to be able to get that lump in her breast checked out.