Tag Archives: health

Perspective – Both Humanity’s, and Mine

USS Zumwalt Destroyer

The U.S. Zumwalt class destroyer, the latest in high-tech destruction. All for the bargain price of $7 billion APIECE. ONE ship, cost billions more than we spend on cancer research, or diabetes research or cardiovascular research.

This will be my last post for…awhile.  This post is on perspective, both from my own personal standpoint, and from the standpoint of humanity as a whole.  We’ll start with humanity as a whole.

The U.S. Navy is building a new class of destroyers.  The highly advanced ships are specifically designed to deal with the “Asia/Pacific” strategy of competing with and containing China.  They are “stealth” ships, with one-of-a-kind weapons systems that can hit targets from over 100 miles away.  They’re massive…the length of 2 football fields.  And the cost?  The cost to build each is just a “mere” $3.8 billion.  With R&D that’s gone into it, they will have spent $7 billion per ship.

$7 billion for one ship.  The Navy had wanted 24.  Now they may “only” get 3.  $21 billion, for 3 ships.  Obviously this is just the tip of the iceberg for our military.  The new F-35 fighter jet program is up to $400 billion, and rising.  The lifetime cost to run the F-35 program?  $1 trillion

Perspective. The ENTIRE National Institutes of Health Budget for the most wealthy country in the world?  $31 billion this year…or the price of 4 new Navy destroyers.  Breaking it down to funding devoted to some of the biggest diseases affecting our citizens:

  • National Cancer Institute – $5.2 billion
  • National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases – $3.1 billion
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease – $4.9 billion
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders – $1.7 billion

It was estimated that 572,000 people died from cancer in the U.S. last year.   There are at LEAST 30 million Americans with diabetes…and likely many more.  The best estimate is that at least 300,000 Americans suffer from Multiple Sclerosis.   And the list goes on…and on…and on…

But yet as the richest nation in the world, we decided to spend $700 billion on our defense budget…and only $31 for the NIHWe decided to spend $7 billion for ONE destroyer…just in CASE we might ever go to war with China in the Pacific Ocean someday.  We spend more for ONE Navy destroyer than we spend on cancer research, diabetes research, or cardiovascular research.

PerspectiveWhat does this say about America?  What does it say when millions of Americans are suffering and dying from cancer, heart disease, diabetes, and other diseases, but we spend more on a handful of ships than we do to combat disease? 

Which leads me to my own perspective.  I do find it cathartic (see blog title) to bring issues like this to the attention of folks.  But…it’s time I take a bit of time to help wrap my own mind around “perspective”.  My little family has hit the jackpot, it looks like we’re going to be a perfect 3-for-3 in terms of each having some wonderful health challenge to face. 

Perspective.  I’m finding it hard to care too much about the upcoming election or other political and environmental issues at the moment, knowing that in the big picture…humanity will continue to have a completely skewed perspective, with small men (mostly!) fighting their small battles over power, money, and notoriety, while ignoring what’s really important in life.  And in the “little” picture…I need to take time to put things in perspective myself. 

Signing out for a while…

Obama’s Big Week

Supreme Court Building

WAY TO GO, JOHN ROBERTS! I take back everything I've ever said about the lack of objectivity in your court. GUTSY move, for you, the Chief Justice, a Bush appointee, to side with the "liberal" justices on the health care bill.

Way to go, SCOTUS!!!

Way to go, John Roberts!!  With the immigration ruling, and with the decision today to uphold ALL parts of the health care law…you may have just turned around the reputation of this Supreme Court as a right-wing, activist court.  It will be very hard now for wacko liberal bloggers like myself to doubt Robert’s objectivity now.   A shocking turn of events.  Obama has been floundering, there’s no doubt.  I never would have thought it would be the Supreme Court that would have given him a big boost.

It will be interesting to see how this affects the election.  Romney this week came out and said Obama’s first term was “wasted” if the health care law were struck down. I’m sure the Romney camp EXPECTED it to be overturned, but now I bet they regret coming out with that statement.  Since the entire law was upheld, Romney’s statement now looks like an endorsement that Obama’s first term HASN’T been a waste, that real, meaningful legislation has been passed.

Wow.

In shock.  And (way) more than a bit emotional, when I think of my son, and what this ruling potentially means to someone like him, a young kid with juvenile diabetes.

Let the whining begin from the right!!  The news is hot off the presses, and we ALREADY having whining, and the typical conservative LIES about the bill.  As a reminder to all you wackos who insist on lying about Obamacare and its effects (From CNN and other sources):

  • The law is intended to end the United States’ status as the only rich country with large numbers of uninsured people, by expanding both the private market and Medicaid
  • Health insurance for between 12.5 million and 24 million more Americans than if the mandate was struck down
  • The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that the law could reduce deficits modestly in the first 10 years and then much more significantly in the second decade
  • Insured Americans may be avoiding a spike in premiums that could have resulted if the high court had tossed out the individual mandate but left other requirements on insurers in place.
  • Millions of young adults up to age 26 who have gained health insurance due to the law will be able to keep it.
  • Since the law remains in place, the requirement that insurers cover people with pre-existing medical conditions remains active
  • The massive health care law requires doctors to report goodies they get from medical supply companies; demands more breastfeeding rooms; requires all chain restaurants to list calories under every menu item, and includes numerous other provisions, which now remain in place.

Horrible!  Reduced deficits!  MILLIONS more Americans covered by insurance!  No turning down the sick for insurance because of their preexisting conditions!!

Tell me again, conservative wackos…why is Obamacare the end of the world in your eyes???!!?

Americans Love Obamacare Provisions

Sometimes it’s downright scary to know we allow everyone over the age of 18 to vote.  I’m not saying it shouldn’t be that way, but, it’s scary to have a democracy built on majority rule, when far too often, the majority are completely ignorant.

In this story, MSNBC notes that 56% of Americans are against Obamacare, with 44% approval.  However…they note that Americans are strongly in favor of the actual CONTENTS of the health care legislation behind Obamacare. 

It’s like someone really LOVING a bag of cookies, but throwing it away because they don’t like the wrapper.  Content good!! Obamacare PR? Bad…in no small part due to Republican distortions (aka, lies) about the bill, and the idiot electorate who is dumb enough to believe the lies.

My son and REAL life – ObamaCare

Alexander
Our son, the week after coming home from the hospital after being diagnosed with Type-1 diabetes.

Obamacare isn’t popular.  But there ARE key provisions of Obamacare that are very popular.  One of these is a guarantee of insurance coverage for those with pre-existing conditions, a provision supported by 85% of Americans.  Other provisions are also very popular, such as the ability to cover your children until they turn 26.  Despite the popularity of these provisions, about half of America would like ObamaCare to be repealed.  Perhaps that half should look past the political BS and look at the real-world effects of ObamaCare.

My 9-year old son has had Type-1 diabetes since just after his 1st birthday.  We are fortunate enough to have good insurance, but I shudder to think of those in our situation without insurance.  Our son has an insulin pump, which alone costs $8,000.  Supplies for the pump?  $1,800 every 3 months.  And that doesn’t include other supplies for testing blood, doctor visits, etc.  What happens for someone like us under Obamacare, vs. under the status quo?  What are the REAL world effects should Obamacare be repealed?

First, Obamacare extends the length of time parents can cover their children.  We could cover our son until his 26th birthday.  Secondly, once he turns 26 and needs to get his own coverage, he couldn’t be discriminated against because of a pre-existing condition.  But what if Obamacare is repealed?  What happens to someone like my son?  What happens when he turns 26, and has to get coverage on his own?  Could he even GET coverage, given that he has Type-1 diabetes?  What happens if he has to change jobs?  In a post-ObamaCare world, who pays the thousands of dollars for supplies that my son’s VERY LIFE depends upon???

My wife and I both have good jobs, but even so, I can’t imagine trying to pay for pump and other supplies, without insurance coverage.  That nightmare is a REALITY for thousands of Americans, until ObamaCare fully takes effect.  We OURSELVES have heard from families with poor or no insurance coverage, who have had a child diagnosed with Type-1 diabetes.  We OURSELVES have gotten stories from parents whose options are few.  For a parent with a child with Type-1 diabetes, you’re constantly fighting against time and the inexorable march of the disease.  As time marches on, the liklihood of complications rises, be it coronary disease, kidney damage, diabetic retinopathy resulting in blindness, etc.  Your ONLY weapon against it right now?  Controlling your child’s blood sugar as best as you can.  To do that, an insulin pump is indispensible.

But this is America.  We seem to value corporate profits more than the health of our own children.  For FAR too many with poor or no insurance coverage, the only choice is to skimp on diabetic supplies, using constant insulin injections and paying for testing supplies as you can.  Do you have ANY idea how DAMN HARD it is to constantly have to give your young child multiple shots, every day, day-after-day, with NO end?  Do you have ANY idea how DAMN HARD it is when the first phrase your child learns to put together is “No Shot!! No Shot!!!” (something we dealt with). It tears your heart out.  God knows I broke down like a baby the first time I had to give my son a shot, while he was in the hospital after being diagnosed.  And that definitely wasn’t the only time.

For the first year and a half after diagnosis, my 1-year old son had to endure a minimum of 3 injections per day, usually more.  Every meal had to be planned in advance, every carb counted.  For 8 years since, we’ve also maintained a constant regimen of blood tests, including my wife and I taking turns being the one who gets up in the middle of the night to check him.  Despite our best efforts, it was very difficult to control his blood sugars during that first year and a half.  Despite our best efforts, I felt like we were “failing” our son, because we knew that in the long-term, an inability to control blood sugars made diabetic complications much more likely.

When our son was 2, we were blessed with the opportunity to start using an insulin pump.  Instead of 3+ injections a day, he only needed one “site change” every 3 days.  Instead of carefully planning every meal and snack well ahead of time to ensure he was getting the right amount of carbs to match the insulin we estimated was left in his body…he now could now eat whatever he wants, whenever he wants.  We just have to type in the number of carbs, and the pump gives him the correct amount of insulin.  Best of all, his blood sugar control was DRAMATICALLY better.  We’ve at least done all we can to slow the progression of the disease.

But let’s say you’re a single mom without health insurance, and you’re facing the same nightmare we have.  Can that single mom afford a pump for her child?  Or is she forced to choose a life of painful injections, KNOWING there’s a better way, but also knowing that in America, the health of her child isn’t as important as the profits of a health insurer?  What about a middle class family in this situation who is forced into a job or location change?  Will that family be able to get insurance coverage for their child with a pre-existing condition?  Or will they too be forced to choose between incredibly expensive payments for insulin pump equipment, or using cheaper methods of blood sugar control?

Why should they HAVE to make that choice?  Is this America?  Or is this some third-world country with a government, health-care system, and a PEOPLE unable, or UNWILLING to make the health of their children a national priority?

THIS is the reality of ObamaCare.  It is NOT a political tool to be wielded like a weapon by the two parties. ObamaCare is about REAL PEOPLE.  It’s about covering people who’s very LIVES are in jeopardy without insurance coverage.  It’s about Americans acting as if they GIVE A DAMN about the health of their children.

Government Gone Wild – Birders Under Attack!!

Bird Bath

Thanks to the crack NYC Health Department for protecting the public from the deadly birdbath scourge that is threatening humanity itself.

I’m a liberal.  To hear some talk, you’d think all liberals are lovers of big government.  No.  Government has its place, but….I’m also a pragmatist.  I have little tolerance for government waste or unnecessary intervention in people’s lives, especially when simple common sense seems completely absent.  Things like the GSA Las Vegas controversy make me PO’d on many levels.

In New York City, birders (and others) have been getting citations from the city health department.  The “Crime” for some of them?  Having a bird bath.  Evidently in New York, it can be a crime to have, of all things, “standing water in a birdbath”.  Funny, I thought that was the whole point of a bird bath.  But the New York City health department is cracking down on ANY standing water in its war on West Nile Virus.  Good luck with that, NYC.  I’m SURE you’re going to eliminate all standing water in the entire New York City area.

If you read the story, it says the NYC Health Department “amended” their standing health code to allow them to control not only mosquitos, but also any CONDITIONS amenable to mosquitos.  Thus, the ability to give $300 tickets to people for the simple “crime” of having a bird bath.  Funny how that seems to happen, where government powers seem to “creep” and expand.  And THIS coming from a flaming liberal, but stuff like this brings out the inner “Ron Paul” in me.

I’m sorry, NYC, mercilessly cracking down on criminal birders and their evil bird baths is NOT going to stop West Nile Virus.  What it IS going to do is make a lot of people PO’D, and get folks complaining even MORE about government.  As someone in government, I can say…the LAST thing we want is for folks to get more upset about government.  Trivializing the law and ignoring common sense accomplishes nothing except to raise people’s dander.

The 9 Politicians on the Supreme Court

John Roberts

Chief Justice John Roberts...just a man. Just like the rest of us, he and his colleagues let their biases affect their decision-making. INCLUDING how they interpret "law".

l’ve purposely tried to avoid getting too immersed in the Supreme Court hearings this week over ObamaCare.  The reason?  Every time I read an update on what’s happening, I get PO’d.  As I stated 2 days ago before things even got started…I fully expect a 5-4 decision that tosses out, at a minimum, the insurance mandate portion of ObamaCare.   Only because there are 5 “conservative” judges and 4 “liberal” judges.

As I stated then, I don’t think the decision will be based on the “law”, but would be based on the political persuasions of the individual justices.  I haven’t seen anything yet that changes my perception of what will happen.  The questions being asked by some of the “conservative” justices seem like something straight out of the Republican presidential campaign right now.  Roberts basically implied a ”what’s next” scenario if ObamaCare is allowed to stand, as if it’s all part of some evil liberal plot for government to take over, well, EVERYTHING!!  BUUUU-WAAA-HAAA-HAAA-HAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!  DRAT, Fellow Liberals!  They’re on to our evil plan!!

What it’s ALL about evidently…Broccolli!!  Scalia even came out and said that if ObamaCare stands…”What’s Next”…the government forcing us all to eat broccoli?  GREAT legal argument, Scalia!!  Broccoli-gate has played an unexpected role in the entire debate.  Scalia also embarassed himself by bitching about the “Cornhusker Kickback” component of ObamaCare.  Only problem…the “Cornhusker Kickback” doesn’t exist, after it was stricken from the original bill before it passed.  Sounds like another Republican trademark…if you can’t find something to bitch about, make up some kind of conspiracy out of thin air.

It’s not like the Supreme Court is different from the rest of government.  After all…all the States fighting against ObamaCare have Republican governors, while those supporting it have Democratic governors.  What an AMAZING coincidence!! 

Politico has a nice story here about the “Roberts Court on Trial“, where they speculate on whether this case will cement, or clear, the perception that political persuasion rules the court.  It’s fascinating to read the transcripts of the discussions over the last three days.  If you knew NOTHING about the court, NOTHING about the individual personalities on the court…it would be IMMEDIATELY apparent upon reading the transcripts who were the “conservative” or “liberal” justices.  Hey, they’re people.  They have biases and opinions just like the rest of us.  And despite their position on the Nation’s highest court, I see few indications that they’re able to look past those biases and prejudices any more than the rest of us.   American “law” is just as apt to be corrupted by the same ugly, partisan, political discourse that has invaded every OTHER aspect of American life.

5 to 4.  Count on it.

Enough with the hypocrisy

The alternative...

Hey! Catholics and Right-wingers!! THIS is what happens when contraception isn't readily available. Given how you right-wing wackos also seem to completely disdain science, I can see how you might not get this point. But it's true!! Do you want an increase in abortions? Do you want more single mothers? Do you want more children living in poverty? Then you're on the right track by trying to restrict access to contraceptives.

GMAB.  I’m really getting sick of the whining about Obama’s initial decision to force groups affiliated with religious organizations to offer coverage for contraception.  The Catholic church claims it’s government interference with their religious beliefs.

Bull$hit (note I’ve used a cleverly disguised curse, to protect the precious and tender morality of any Catholic who might be reading this).   Enough of the mock outrage, Catholics.  An astounding 98% of Catholic women have used contraceptive devices at some point in their life.  THE VAST MAJORITY of Catholics disagree with the (freakin’ stupid) decree from the Catholic Church outlawing use of contraceptives.   ENOUGH OF THE HYPOCRISY.  ENOUGH OF THE COMPLETELY FAKE OUTRAGE.  

Frankly, I think the outcry from MOST of the conservative right has VERY little to do with the issue itself, and more to do with the fact that it was Obama who issued the decree.  This isn’t about religious freedom.  It’s about discriminatory treatment of women, all wrapped up in a nice warm fuzzy Catholic blanket.  

Note to Catholic Church…get out of the freakin’ dark ages. 

Note to the Republican Party…Now that the economy is strengthening, now that Obama has killed Bin Laden, are you SO desperate to find some TINY little shred of an issue to attack Obama, that this has someone become a rallying cry for your party?   DO SO AT YOUR OWN RISK, GOP.   Continue to push this, and we’ll see how women vote in the election come November.

Obamacare Covering 2.5 Million more youth

Thanks to the new health care bill, the percentage of young Americans with health insurance has risen dramatically. If I'm Obama, I'm DARING the GOP to focus on repeal.

Why in the hell so many people are against the health care reform bill is beyond me.  Every INDEPENDENT (aka, NOT FOX NEWS!!) analysis has shown the bill will reduce costs, or at least be a wash, AND cover millions more Americans.  But yet the right has chosen Obamacare as a rallying cry against big government, and a rallying cry for the 2012 election, lying about the costs and benefits of the bill while they’re at it.

Yesterday, the CDC announced that thanks to the new health care bill, 2.5 million more young Americans have health coverage.  In the 19-25 year range, the percentage of insured rose from 64% to 73%.  The increase is largely due to a provision which allows parents to keep their children on their insurance through age 26. 

Obama has had a terrific foreign policy record since taking office, capturing Bin Laden and ending the Iraq war.  Now, things are starting to roll his way more on domestic issues.  Unemployment is edging down, first time applicants for unemployment are at their lowest level since the recession began, and now, the benefits of the health care bill are starting to take effect.  If nothing else, Obama has a LOT of ammunition for 2012 debates against the GOP candidate.  He’s had some remarkable successes, especially given the cards he was dealt, and the impossible to work with GOP-led House.